Q: How do Venture Capital Firms really feel about founder salaries? I was told that a general rule of thumb is 75% of fair market value. I am considering taking on a well established, rather expensive co-founder.
Let me add just one thought to the discussion on founder salaries, once you are venture-backed.
There are lots of good ideas for all different situations:
- 75% of market for founders’ salaries.
- $10k a year.
- $10k a month.
- Market once you are well funded ($10m+), not until then.
- Etc. etc.
There are lots of good answers. And also — lots of different situations.
In my first start-up, we raised $9.2m in the seed round. So it really didn’t matter that much in that scenario. The second time, I funded the prototype myself ($0 salary) and then we raised a $2.6m seed and I took a small salary (no need to be $0 anymore, but anything large would decrease the runway). So different situations = different answers, up to a point.
One thing I have learned, though.
If the founders are the highest compensated people in the start-up, at least pre-Scale (e.g., pre $10m ARR) … and perhaps even always … something is wrong. Incentives are not aligned here.
If the founders are really going for it, there’s always one great engineer, a Stretch VP, even a sales rep, a marketing lead, someone, the first great hire that wasn’t quite a founder but still is great … that makes more than the founders. Always.
If the founders take the highest salaries though …
Then … usually … I’m out.
Other than that, as long as it’s appropriate, and doesn’t harm the runway of the company, most anything fair seems right to me.
So once you’ve raised a bit, if you make sure at least someone else on the team makes more than the founders … that great VP you just hired for example … you’ve probably found the right compensation level for you as CEO.
The post One Simple Rule On How Much To Pay Yourself Once You Raise Venture Capital appeared first on SaaStr.
via https://ift.tt/2Jn9P8X by Jason Lemkin, Khareem Sudlow
